PBS would not care how liberal they sound when their White Home correspondent Yamiche Alcindor goes on the hot-talk applications on MSNBC and launches into how “cruelty was the purpose” of President Trump’s immigration insurance policies, “to attempt to torture immigrants on the border.” On Tuesday’s Deadline: White Home, host Nicolle Wallace may solely agree: “Trump turned human beings into moveable pawns and took pleasure in torturing them.”
Alcindor concluded: “And I’ve to say, one different factor underscoring all of this as we speak about this racial reckoning is xenophobia — is racism — is white supremacy.”
The PBS correspondent started her evaluation by informing viewers that Biden administration officers worry an enormous rush of unlawful immigrants flooding throughout the border to benefit from new administration insurance policies, after which recalled complaints by some liberals that President Barack Obama was not tolerant sufficient of unlawful immigrants:
Keep in mind that President Obama, for lots of immigration activists, was referred to as the “deporter in chief.” His insurance policies have been seen as hardline — not as merciless as President Trump, however nonetheless hardline. I believe the large concern right here is that Biden is taking on for a President who had a coverage the place cruelty was the purpose — the place separation was the purpose — the place the deterrent was to attempt to torture immigrants on the border to attempt to get them to cease coming.
As regular, it was not clarified that the reason youngsters have been separated from their dad and mom was in order that adults — who most likely would not qualify for asylum — could possibly be stored incarcerated till their instances had been accomplished, moderately than launch them into the U.S. with no straightforward method to discover and deport them later.
When Alcindor jumped again in, she portrayed the separation of unlawful immigrant households as one of many worst issues any President has completed:
Let’s do not forget that President Trump — for all the issues that he did within the 4 years that he was in workplace — household separation particularly will go down as one of the signature harmful, merciless, dehumanizing issues {that a} President has completed within the historical past of the US. It can’t be — it may be in contrast in some methods to the center passage separating African People and throwing them throughout the US.
This was a coverage that ripped youngsters out of the arms of their dad and mom and their guardians, and you’ll’t un-see the pictures that we noticed on the border with crying youngsters with youngsters in cages, with younger youngsters attempting to take care of different younger youngsters as a result of their dad and mom have been kidnapped basically from them…
After suggesting that unlawful immigrants are entitled to “reparations” from the nation they have been attempting to sneak into, Alcindor cried racism as she concluded:
And I’ve to say, one different factor underscoring all of this as we speak about this racial reckoning is xenophobia — is racism — is white supremacy. How — while you separate brown youngsters particularly from their moms, we’ve to ask ourselves, “How was that allowed to occur? And what function did white supremacy play in that?”
This episode of Deadline: White Home on MSNBC was sponsored partly by. Prevagen. Their contact data is linked.
MSNBC
Deadline: White Home
February 2, 2021
5:08 p.m. Jap
YAMICHE ALCINDOR, PBS NEWSHOUR WHITE HOUSE CORRESPONDENT: Biden officers actually do not need to have the message going on the market are — is now open borders within the United, States, and that People are simply welcoming individuals who come to the border and illegally, and in some methods they’re actually fearful about undocumented immigrants coming to America considering that the Biden administration goes to be extra lenient and be lenient on the border. Keep in mind that President Obama, for lots of immigration activists, was referred to as the “deporter in chief.” His insurance policies have been seen as hardline — not as merciless as President Trump, however nonetheless hardline. I believe the large concern right here is that Biden is taking on for a President who had a coverage the place cruelty was the purpose — the place separation was the purpose — the place the deterrent was to attempt to torture immigrants on the border to attempt to get them to cease coming.
The Biden administration saying they are not going to do this, however in addition they in some methods usually are not saying precisely what they’ll do. Additionally they do not know what number of youngsters have been separated. That could be a query that’s nonetheless hanging within the air. Courtroom paperwork say it could possibly be round 600 perhaps — White Home officers inform me and different reporters a thousand. However there’s an actual query of, “What did President Trump truly do?” There are studies — in my reporting, I discovered that there wasn’t on the entrance in any respect this data gathered to be able to make reuniting households simpler. I keep in mind — I’ll always remember speaking to a father who was deported with out his daughter to Central America. There all these immigrants who suffered by the hands of the US authorities that basically are actually taking a look at this and saying this is not the time now the place this authorities goes to be extra lenient,
And the Biden administration is admittedly, actually attempting to be cautious about that. I believe the opposite factor to notice right here is that there are literally thousands of immigrants that are actually ready in Mexico and that have been asylum seekers that weren’t speculated to be despatched again to Mexico. And the Biden administration is saying, “We can’t have folks enrolled in that program once more, however those self same folks, they will have to attend a bit longer. So there’s actual tense — there’s an actual stress right here with the truth that the Biden administration says that they need to do one thing whereas they need to be humane, however there are additionally immigrants who’re saying that is pressing — “Not solely are we nonetheless separated from our youngsters, however we’re additionally dwelling in harmful circumstances that worldwide organizations say was not the way in which that this must be dealt with.”
NICOLLE WALLACE: You already know, Eddie (Glaude), it feels prefer it’s necessary to separate out all of the elements of the story that Jacob (Soboroff) and Yamiche must cowl and, I believe to focus in on the one characteristic of the Trump presidency that was so utterly outed by this basket of insurance policies which was the dehumanization of migrants. And I believe Yamiche simply articulated an evidence for why the final three Presidents tried to attempt. The three Presidents earlier than him didn’t muster bipartisan assist for complete immigration reform. … And Trump clearly did not attempt, however nobody has handled immigration at its root degree, after which Trump turned human beings into moveable pawns and took pleasure in torturing them.
(…)
ALCINDOR: Let’s do not forget that President Trump — for all the issues that he did within the 4 years that he was in workplace — household separation particularly will go down as one of the signature harmful, merciless, dehumanizing issues {that a} President has completed within the historical past of the US. It can’t be — it may be in contrast in some methods to the center passage separating African People and throwing them throughout the US.
This was a coverage that ripped youngsters out of the arms of their dad and mom and their guardians, and you’ll’t un-see the pictures that we noticed on the border with crying youngsters with youngsters in cages, with younger youngsters attempting to take care of different younger youngsters as a result of their dad and mom have been kidnapped basically from them, Biden has to now are available and say, “I am going tp do that otherwise,” and he has mentioned that he is going to do that otherwise — that he is going to have a look at immigrants in a means that isn’t dehumanizing. I believe that that is going to be the coverage that they will attempt to implement, and I believe there are going to be journalists like me and Jacob and others which are actually going to be asking, “What’s owed to those immigrants?”
As a result of I am additionally considering of a girl — I do know we have been speaking about household separation — however the stay in Mexico coverage — I went all the way down to Mexico and interviewed a girl who was kidnapped alongside along with her younger daughter whereas being compelled to stay in Mexico — once more, a coverage that was decreed by worldwide companies — that was seen as inhumane and was seen as utterly not a part of the asylum-seeking course of that was unlawful, basically, within the eyes of worldwide communities. That lady was kidnapped. What’s she now owed? And the way are we going to search out her?
These are the questions that the Biden administration has not answered — but these are going to be the questions which are part of the insurance policies — not simply “How are they going to tweak and alter issues?” but in addition, “What are the reparations in some methods owed to so many of those People — so many of those immigrants moderately — that have been now in some methods thrown away by America? And I’ve to say, one different factor underscoring all of this as we speak about this racial reckoning is xenophobia — is racism — is white supremacy. How — while you separate brown youngsters particularly from their moms, we’ve to ask ourselves, “How was that allowed to occur? And what function did white supremacy play in that?
WALLACE: Completely. I imply, I believe that that is on the root of all of those conversations, you recognize, simply decreasing — reversing heinous insurance policies. It is — once more, as with the extremist menace that we have all been warned about persisting via April 30. It is the hazard of mainstreaming and what Trump ushered in was white supremacy, making it — legitimizing it as a consider American political life.
