Whoever succeeds Kevin Sneader on the helm of McKinsey ought to give Goldman Sachs boss David Solomon a name. 

Although Goldman is a listed financial institution and McKinsey a privately owned consultancy, they’ve a lot in frequent. Each have lengthy loved excessive standing — envied by friends, aspired to by the neatest job-seeking graduates and seen by many purchasers as offering gold customary service. The trite “Nobody bought fired for hiring . . . ” is cited with regards to McKinsey and Goldman alike.

Each have been by way of the wringer, too. McKinsey’s newest scandal got here to the fore final month when the agency agreed to pay $574m to settle lawsuits over its recommendation to firms behind an epidemic of opioid dependancy. Inside weeks Sneader was ousted. The affair comes after a gentle stream of reputational hits for McKinsey, most dramatically the 2014 imprisonment of former longtime chief Rajat Gupta for insider buying and selling.

No Goldman boss has been incarcerated, however the financial institution’s identify has been repeatedly dragged by way of the mud over the previous decade and extra. In October final 12 months, it paid a record $2.9bn in a worldwide regulatory settlement over the 1MDB money-laundering scandal.

Each establishments had suffered for a number of the very causes that had made them profitable — pleasure of their excellence had turned to conceitedness; success had spurred overhasty progress and greed.

McKinsey’s growth has been notably excessive. Its workers rely, now about 30,000, has grown 30-fold in 30 years, decreasing the bar on the standard of recruits and making it tougher to uphold ethics. McKinsey has remained a partnership, whereas Goldman turned a listed enterprise in 1999, however each have misplaced their previous tradition of discretion and secrecy.

Loads of frequent floor, then, to maintain a dialog between Solomon and whoever McKinsey’s companions choose as their new chief: San Francisco-based Bob Sternfels or Amsterdam-based Sven Smit.

The lads may take consolation of their mutual capability to face up to the sort of disaster confronting McKinsey. Underpinning a stubbornly sturdy franchise is an enormous alumni community that solely Goldman can rival.

Such webs serve two capabilities. One is to advocate for the manufacturers, together with by spreading counter-narratives to any prevailing critique. And extra concretely, they will broaden the enterprise, both by cementing a relationship when an alumnus lands in a senior place at a consumer, or by producing enterprise from the brand new employer.

Goldman has lengthy prolonged its comfortable energy by way of alumni with prime roles in US authorities, finance and enterprise.

McKinsey’s 42,000 alumni are extra organised. They’re sure into the agency by way of a loyalty born of collaborative teamworking (additionally a characteristic of the Goldman community), however effectively consolidated by way of a busy diary of networking seminars and dinners with the elite of enterprise and politics.

And they’re all over the place: research by the FT’s Lex column discovered ex-McKinsey consultants on the boards or in C-suites of greater than 70 S&P 500 firms. Exterior the US, the agency’s community can be notably embedded in Germany, Japan, China and the UK. The Metropolis of London could be gutted with out them, given they’re in management roles on the Prudential Regulation Authority, Authorized & Common, Marks and Spencer, NatWest and lots of extra organisations.

How useful are such connections in a disaster? As Solomon reset Goldman’s technique after the catastrophes of 2008 and 1MDB, they are going to have been an vital buttress. For instance, David Schwimmer (who left Goldman in 2018 to helm the London Inventory Change) used the financial institution to advise on its all-important Refinitiv acquisition.

Regardless of two international crises in 13 years, the financial institution is now driving excessive, with a pre-2008-style return on fairness of 21 per cent on the final rely. The share value is simply off report highs hit final week, outperforming all its main rivals, each short-term (because the 1MDB settlement), and long-term (since its 1999 itemizing).

As a personal partnership, McKinsey reveals scant monetary info, however its income — doubled in a decade to $10bn on the final level of disclosure in 2018 — is forward of the competitors. Whether or not it stays that means will depend upon whether or not Sternfels or Smit can impose Goldmanesque self-discipline on administration and governance — and faucet these alumni to full impact.

patrick.jenkins@ft.com