Former President Donald J. Trump’s legal professionals opened and closed their impeachment protection in a span of three hours on Friday. They referred to as the Home’s cost towards Mr. Trump a “preposterous and monstrous lie,” and their arguments drew reward from Republican senators. After the protection rested, senators submitted questions to every facet. Closing arguments are set to start on Saturday, most certainly adopted by a swift verdict.

Listed here are takeaways from the fourth day of Mr. Trump’s trial.

Republican senators lauded Mr. Trump’s three-hour protection, throughout which his legal professionals accused Home impeachment managers of taking the previous president’s phrases and actions out of context, complained about what they noticed because the information media’s unfair protection of their shopper and introduced lots of Mr. Trump’s personal speaking factors and narratives.

It was virtually as if Mr. Trump was presenting his protection himself. And lawmakers applauded it as an enormous enchancment over the rambling and disorganized argument one in all his legal professionals, Bruce L. Castor Jr., delivered on Tuesday, a efficiency that was extensively panned and infuriated Mr. Trump.

The protection legal professionals mentioned the Home managers manipulated their shopper’s phrases and pointed to Mr. Trump’s name to his supporters in his Jan. 6 speech to “peacefully and patriotically make your voices heard.”

Mr. Castor mentioned, “The Home managers took from that: ‘Go right down to the Capitol and riot.’”

However that isn’t what Mr. Trump was asking his supporters to do, Mr. Castor mentioned: “He needed them to assist main challenges.”

The previous president stood for legislation and order, Michael T. van der Veen, one in all Mr. Trump’s legal professionals, mentioned, choosing up a phrase the president has used repeatedly.

“Mr. Trump did the other of advocating for lawless motion, the other,” Mr. van der Veen mentioned. “He expressly advocated for peaceable motion on the Save America rally.”

Senator Ron Johnson of Wisconsin raved in regards to the protection.

“The president’s legal professionals blew the Home managers’ case out of the water — they only legally eviscerated their case,” he informed reporters. Mr. Johnson was among the many Republican lawmakers who had deliberate on Jan. 6 to challenge the Electoral College tally of Mr. Biden’s victory. However his plans modified after the assault.

Senator Lisa Murkowski, Republican of Alaska, informed reporters that the protection gave “a a lot stronger presentation” than it did earlier within the week. Ms. Murkowski voted with Democrats to search out the Senate trial of a former president constitutional, and Democrats have hoped they might depend on her to vote to convict Mr. Trump.

The previous president’s legal professionals started their protection by attacking the Home impeachment managers’ case, taking intention at most of the compelling video displays the Democrats made all through the week.

The legal professionals produced break up screens for senators, juxtaposing footage that Home managers confirmed in the course of the first three days of the trial with what the protection argued actually occurred. Many had been labeled “MANAGERS” and “REALITY.”

“Like each different politically motivated witch hunt the left has engaged in over the previous 4 years, this impeachment is totally divorced from the information, the proof and the pursuits of the American folks,” Mr. van der Veen mentioned.

The Home managers used video footage to inform the story of Jan. 6 in Mr. Trump’s and the rioters’ personal phrases. They confirmed scenes of what was taking place outdoors the Senate chamber when the senators — in the identical area the place the trial has been held — had been dashing to security and performed recordings of misery calls from officers who had been vastly outnumbered by the violent mob.

Mr. Trump’s protection group delivered a rapid-fire video montage of Democrats saying the phrase “battle” of their political speeches, difficult a key Home argument that Mr. Trump incited the assault on Jan. 6 by telling his supporters to “battle” in a speech simply earlier than urging them to march to the Capitol.

Earlier within the week, Home managers performed video of that speech, together with Mr. Trump saying: “We battle like hell. And for those who don’t battle like hell, you’re not going to have a rustic anymore.”

Mr. Trump’s legal professionals keep that this figurative language is frequent amongst politicians, as evidenced by the video montage, which they asserted included the entire Home managers in addition to Democratic senators utilizing phrases similar to: “You don’t get what you don’t battle for.” “Get on this battle.” “We’ll battle after we should battle.” “We’re on this battle for our lives.”

The ultimate clip on one of many battle reels was of Kamala Harris, a senator on the time, on “The Ellen DeGeneres Present” in April 2018.

Ms. DeGeneres requested Ms. Harris: “In case you needed to be caught in an elevator with both President Trump, Mike Pence or Jeff Classes, who would it not be?”

Ms. Harris responded, “Does one in all us have to come back out alive?” drawing laughter from her host and the viewers.

Mr. van der Veen set free a deep sigh because the video ended.

One Democratic lawmaker took subject with the montage.

“Sure, all of us at some occasions have used the phrase ‘battle,’” Senator Chris Coons of Delaware informed reporters throughout a break. However, he mentioned, Democrats didn’t inform folks to battle proper earlier than their supporters launched an assault.

The Trump protection group argued that the Democratic-led Home made a “snap” impeachment when it charged Mr. Trump with high crimes and misdemeanors for inciting an rebellion. The previous president’s legal professionals mentioned the Home didn’t completely examine the occasions of Jan. 6, and this robbed their shopper of due course of.

“Jiminy Crickets, there isn’t any due course of on this continuing in any respect,” Mr. van der Veen mentioned in the course of the question-and-answer portion of the trial on Friday afternoon.

Mr. van der Veen was speaking in regards to the Home investigation, through which there aren’t any “enforceable rights” to due course of. However his level is a reminder that an impeachment trial may be very totally different from the judicial trials persons are aware of within the nation’s court docket programs. Impeachment trials are political proceedings.

For instance, on this trial, Senator Patrick J. Leahy of Vermont is the presiding officer, a witness to the occasions which are the topic of the trial and a member of the jury. The protection identified that that might be a battle of curiosity in every other courtroom.

On Thursday, three Republican senators — members of the jury on this trial — met with Mr. Trump’s protection group to debate technique, a transfer that’s extremely inappropriate in courtrooms outdoors the Senate chamber.

And most of the jurors on this trial had made up their minds lengthy earlier than the proceedings began, simply as that they had final yr in Mr. Trump’s first impeachment trial.

The decision then fell virtually fully alongside social gathering traces, and the identical is predicted this time and in future impeachment proceedings. As Alexander Hamilton described in one of the Federalist Papers, impeachable crimes are “these offenses which proceed from the misconduct of public males, or, in different phrases, from the abuse or violation of some public belief.”

“They’re of a nature which can with peculiar propriety be denominated POLITICAL,” he continued, “as they relate mainly to accidents completed instantly to the society itself.”

Reporting was contributed by Luke Broadwater, Glenn Thrush, Maggie Haberman and Adam Liptak.